Comments on: Tools fo Debugging Urchin Software http://cutroni.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/ Untangling the world of web analytics Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:37:49 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Justin Cutroni http://cutroni.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/comment-page-1/#comment-257 Justin Cutroni Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:13:33 +0000 http://www.epikone.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/#comment-257 Hi Brian, It's probably due to a difference in the tracking method. My guess is that you're tracking people in urchin using an IP based tracking method while GA is using a cookie based tracking method. Hope that helps, Justin Hi Brian,

It’s probably due to a difference in the tracking method. My guess is that you’re tracking people in urchin using an IP based tracking method while GA is using a cookie based tracking method.

Hope that helps,

Justin

]]> By: Brian Squires http://cutroni.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/comment-page-1/#comment-256 Brian Squires Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:34:58 +0000 http://www.epikone.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/#comment-256 I own this site. It went live in June 08. It was set-up w/urchin analytics. I wanted to see the cities that visitors are coming from so I had my developer add google analytics. My question is : why is the visitor count from the google reports at least 60-70% lower than urchin visitor count?? It's driving me crazy. I own this site. It went live in June 08. It was set-up w/urchin analytics. I wanted to see the cities that visitors are coming from so I had my developer add google analytics. My question is : why is the visitor count from the google reports at least 60-70% lower than urchin visitor count?? It’s driving me crazy.

]]> By: Justin Cutroni http://cutroni.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/comment-page-1/#comment-255 Justin Cutroni Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:29:27 +0000 http://www.epikone.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/#comment-255 Hi Krishna, I assume you're using Urchin 5... Urchin is not a multi threading application, so get a single quad core machine with the 8 GB of memory. Urchin will not use all 8 GB of memory directly, but the machine will run faster with the 8 gb. Urchin should have no problem with 1 GB of logs a day. You will need to use the UTM to identify unique visitors. Hope that helps. Justin Hi Krishna,

I assume you’re using Urchin 5… Urchin is not a multi threading application, so get a single quad core machine with the 8 GB of memory. Urchin will not use all 8 GB of memory directly, but the machine will run faster with the 8 gb.

Urchin should have no problem with 1 GB of logs a day.

You will need to use the UTM to identify unique visitors.

Hope that helps.

Justin

]]> By: Krishna Baddam http://cutroni.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/comment-page-1/#comment-254 Krishna Baddam Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:22:20 +0000 http://www.epikone.com/blog/2006/09/01/tools-fo-debugging-urchin-software/#comment-254 We are setting up Urchin for a client with 1Gb of compressed logs per day. They would like to keep one year history. We have to get Win 2003 machine. My question is: Is it better to get two quad core processor machine with 4Gb memory or one quad core processor machine with 8gb of memory? Can urchin use the extra processor? Also will Urchin be able to handle all that data? One additional question is with out using UTM can we be able to get unique user counts? We are setting up Urchin for a client with 1Gb of compressed logs per day. They would like to keep one year history. We have to get Win 2003 machine. My question is: Is it better to get two quad core processor machine with 4Gb memory or one quad core processor machine with 8gb of memory? Can urchin use the extra processor? Also will Urchin be able to handle all that data? One additional question is with out using UTM can we be able to get unique user counts?

]]>